Legacy vs Evolve
Juan Farah on November 18th 2025
Why “leaving it as is” quietly gets more expensive—and how SWT Evolve flips the math.
TL;DR: Keeping an Eclipse RCP/SWT application with outdated UI/UX looks cheaper this quarter, but it compounds hidden costs: frustrated users, rising maintenance effort, talent retention issues, and a steeper eventual modernization curve. SWT Evolve delivers a modern, branded, cloud-ready experience without rewrites, preserving your SWT APIs while upgrading UX, performance, and security.
The compounding cost of “staying legacy”
“Do nothing” isn’t neutral. It’s a choice that accrues interest.
The alternative: Evolve (not rewrite)
SWT Evolve modernizes the presentation layer behind your existing org.eclipse.swt.* APIs. Your Java code stays intact; the experience becomes modern, themeable, and ready for the browser—without the rewrite pain.
Three headline capabilities
- 1. Corporate theming & branding
- 2. Web deployment & cloud-ready
- 3. Advanced performance & security
Side-by-side: Staying Legacy vs. Adopting SWT Evolve
| Stay Outdated (Legacy) | Evolve with SWT Evolve | |
|---|---|---|
| UX & Adoption | Dated visuals and patterns depress user satisfaction and training outcomes | Modern look/feel, clearer patterns, higher adoption and satisfaction |
| Delivery Risk | Modernization risk grows over time; big-bang rewrites loom | Instant deployment with existing code; zero risk |
| Time to Value | Improvements require major projects or rewrites | Rapid uplift via theming, branding, and renderer upgrade |
| Developer Velocity | Slower—workarounds and brittle UI code paths | Faster—clean styling controls and predictable behavior |
| Talent Attraction/Retention | Harder to keep teams excited on legacy UI | Easier to hire and retain; modern toolchain story |
| Security & Compliance | Older layers limit adoption of current practices | Align with modern security expectations and policies |
| Cloud & Remote Access | Desktop-only distribution limits reach | Optional web deployment unlocks browser access |
| TCO (3–5 years) | Rising maintenance + eventual rewrite costs | Lower ongoing costs; rewrite avoided or deferred |
| Brand & Trust | UI looks “behind,” hurting perception | On-brand experience signals quality and longevity |
| Strategic Flexibility | Future changes are riskier and slower | Flexible: desktop and web paths without recoding |
Many teams see up to 90% less effort versus a full rewrite because the application logic and SWT API surface remain intact while the UI layer is modernized.
Why modernization gets harder the longer you wait
Evolve early—while you still control the timeline—rather than modernize late under pressure.
A practical path (no architecture deep-dive)
- 1. Drop-in modernization: Keep your SWT APIs; modernize the presentation layer.
- 2. Brand & accessibility pass: Apply corporate theming, improve contrast, spacing, focus, and keyboard flows.
- 3. Optional web delivery: When it helps distribution or access, ship a browser edition—same codebase.
- 4. Iterate safely: Roll out to a pilot group, measure satisfaction and task times, then expand.
Bottom line
To learn more about how SWT Evolve can provide a future for your application, visit our GitHub repository or contact us to discuss a modernization prototype.